Institutional Re-victimization: The Effects of Judicial Procedures on the Psychological Well-Being of Human Trafficking Victims

Abstract Book of the 11th International Conference on Modern Research in Social Sciences

Year: 2026

[PDF]

Institutional Re-victimization: The Effects of Judicial Procedures on the Psychological Well-Being of Human Trafficking Victims

Rus Mihaela

ABSTRACT:

Institutional re-victimization represents a significant challenge within the adjudication of human trafficking cases, referring to the additional psychological harm victims may experience through their interaction with judicial systems. This paper examines the extent to which procedural practices, such as repeated testimonies, confrontational questioning, and credibility assessments—can inadvertently reproduce elements of the original trauma. Drawing on contemporary literature in legal psychology and victimology, the analysis highlights how these practices may exacerbate symptoms associated with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, including anxiety, emotional distress, and intrusive recollections.
The study further explores the role of adversarial legal frameworks in intensifying victims’ vulnerability, particularly when institutional responses lack sensitivity to trauma-related needs. In such contexts, victims may perceive the justice process as invalidating or hostile, leading to decreased cooperation, withdrawal from proceedings, and diminished trust in legal institutions. This phenomenon not only affects victims’ psychological well-being but may also compromise the quality of testimony and, ultimately, the effectiveness of judicial outcomes.
In contrast, the paper emphasizes the importance of trauma-informed and victim-centered approaches within legal procedures. Measures such as limiting repeated interviews, ensuring privacy, providing psychological support, and training legal professionals in trauma awareness are identified as critical in reducing the risk of secondary victimization. These practices contribute to a more balanced legal process that safeguards both evidentiary integrity and victim welfare.
The findings underscore the need for systemic reforms that integrate psychological considerations into judicial procedures, promoting a more humane and effective response to human trafficking cases.

Keywords: Institutional Re-Victimization; Human Trafficking Victims; Judicial Procedures; Secondary Victimization; Trauma-Informed Justice; Psychological Well-Being; Legal Psychology; Victim-Centered Approach; Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder; Credibility Assessment