Proceedings of the International Conference on Art Studies
Year: 2024
DOI:
[PDF]
Whose Voice Matters? Analyzing Diverse Interpretations of Art
Donna L. Roberts
ABSTRACT:
This research explores the multifaceted nature of art interpretation by examining the perspectives of five distinct groups: the artist, the general public, art critics, other artists, and art historians. Through a comparative analysis, the paper investigates how each group’s unique background, motivations, and expertise influence their understanding and evaluation of art. The research draws on case studies and critical reviews to highlight the discrepancies and overlaps in interpretation among these groups. Specifically, while artists may intend specific meanings in their work, the public and critics often bring their own cultural and personal experiences to their interpretations, sometimes diverging significantly from the artist’s intent. Art historians, on the other hand, contextualize art within broader historical and cultural narratives, adding layers of meaning that may not have been apparent at the time of the artwork’s creation. The paper concludes that no single interpretation holds ultimate authority; rather, the diversity of perspectives enriches the discourse around art, leading to a more comprehensive understanding. By addressing the question “Whose voice matters?” the paper argues that all voices contribute valuable insights, emphasizing the importance of considering multiple viewpoints in the interpretation of art. This research offers significant implications for art appreciation, education, and criticism, advocating for an inclusive approach to understanding art.
keywords: art interpretation, art criticism, artistic intent, artistic meaning, impact of art