Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper evaluates the validity of the foundational ethical conception of Justice and its contesting contradictory conception, Utilitarianism in framing the institutional structure of a nation. Thereby the paper asserts the importance of Justice and certain virtues to a nation’s rise and fall and observes greatest impediment of Justice in the idea of Utilitarianism. While Utilitarianism advances its own conception of Justice, based on critical-theoretical approach the article advances three-fold arguments in order to reprove Utilitarianism of its claim. Utilitarianism is not a viable form of Justice since the theory represents a form of egoism, is structurally inconsistent to sound ethical doctrine, and because it has dissolved the end and means dichotomy.

Keywords

Categorical Imperative End and Means Just-War Theory (JWT) Law of Nature Relative Law

Article Details

How to Cite
Haokip, S. N. (2022). Utilitarianism: Greatst Impediment to Justice. Journal of Advanced Research in Social Sciences, 5(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.33422/jarss.v5i3.841

Most read articles by the same author(s)